Some Thoughts on Resistance, Suffering and the Ways of the World from a Peace Church Perspective
This blog post was prompted by discussions taking place in my current webinar series on nonviolent understandings of the atonement.
Understandably, the
strong division between the kingdoms of the world and the kingdom of God and the emphasis on suffering as a way of overcoming evil in the Anabaptist and Quaker traditions is challenging and discomforting to
many of us. In this blog post, I offer a few reflections on these matters.
1. We all face choices when it comes to matters of conscience.
When we encounter issues prompted by our conscience and our convictions, we are faced with a fundamental choice; how far are we prepared to go in being true to our convictions? This is at the very heart of the issue of suffering and persecution. It is a matter of discernment and witness both for individuals and for communities who are committed to following the way of Jesus.
2. A few
basic options
When we are faced
with an issue that challenges our conscience and convictions, in terms of our
response, we have a few basic options:
- Avoidance - We can choose to avoid the issue or run away from the impending conflict/confrontation.
- Conformity - we can choose to conform to what the wider society/the powers require of us rather than stand by our conscience and convictions.
- Physical Force - we can choose to fight physically against the powers/people/ideology we oppose.
- Nonviolent Resistance - we can choose to resist the powers/people/ideology we oppose using nonviolent means.
From a peace church perspective, steadfastly upholding one's convictions and the promptings of one's conscience through nonviolent resistance, represents the true way of Jesus.
3. How far
are we prepared to go?
We all have to
decide how far we are prepared to go in resisting something that is contrary to
our conscience and convictions. In making such a decision, we will inevitably
reflect upon the implications of our actions. An uncompromising position may
well produce very costly implications (e.g. we may become a figure of fun or be
despised by people, we may face criminal proceedings and imprisonment, ultimately,
we may face losing our lives). In this sense, suffering, of whatever type
or severity, can be seen as an essential aspect of being true to ourselves and what guides
and inspire us.
4. Is 'the
world' fundamentally good or evil?
When we talk about
'the world' we are not talking about the physical creation but rather about
human culture, systems, institutions and ideologies that shape how society
functions. Some aspects of 'the world' might be regarded as positive or benign
(e.g. ideas of human rights, and the collective provision of health and education
services), others might be regarded as negative or evil (e.g. exploitative
economic systems, discriminatory social systems, violent political and military
systems). What we regard as positive/benign or negative/evil is a matter of
discernment. However, it is also a function of our relationship to 'the world'.
If we are Western European, white, male, middle class, able-bodied, straight
and cis-gendered our experience means that we are more likely to perceive 'the
world' as positive and benign. If we are non-Western European, black, female,
working class, disabled, and LGBT+ our experience means that we are more likely
to perceive 'the world' as negative and evil. So
different positions of power and privilege will produce different perceptions
of the nature and character of 'the world'. If we experience life on the
powerful/privileged end of the spectrum, we may be largley oblivious of
the negative dimensions of the world, as these are outside of our actual
experience.
5. Opposing
and resisting the ways of 'the world'
Opposing and
resisting the dominant ways of the world can be a risky business. When one
kicks against the way things are, there can be all sorts of negative
implications (from mild discomfort right through to the loss of one's life).
Suffering, therefore, is an unavoidable issue. We will have to confront it if we are
committed to following our conscience and convictions in a world that is a mix
of positive/benign and negative/evil characteristics. This is particularly so
if we are at the powerless/oppressed end of the spectrum or committed to being an ally
of the powerless and oppressed.
6.
Suffering, oppression and the issue of violence
If we wish to
oppose and resist the negative/evil aspect of the world, we need to discern how
this should be done. Do we adopt a steadfastly nonviolent approach or do
we accept that, in some circumstances (e.g. the liberation of the poor and oppressed)
some use of violence and physical force is legitimate? This is the point at
which there is a clear tension between a peace church perspective (which
tends to reject the use of violence in any circumstances) and a liberational
perspective (which may advocate the use of violence and physical force in some
circumstances).
7. Following the Way of the Lamb
In all of this we need to ask
ourselves searching questions about the nature of the way of Jesus. If we are
committed to being disciples of Jesus; following after Jesus and walking the
way of Jesus, how does this affect our approach to the role of suffering,
nonviolent resistance and the use of physical force as methods of resisting
and overcoming evil? How do we view the ways of 'the world' from a Jesus
perspective? We are all part of 'the world' and have a responsibility to play our
part in shaping how it develops and changes. In reality, there is no opting out (e.g. avoidance is never really avoidance. It is simply an acceptance of the status quo). We are forced
to continually choose between the practices of avoidance, conformity, physical force and
nonviolent resistance and in doing this we need to be aware of our position within the power structures of the world. If we are privileged in terms of power, might this make us more likely to opt for avoidance and conformity rather than resistance and the suffering that this can bring?
Collectively, the followers of Jesus are called to offer a visible public witness to a new way of being human, to a new creation. The way of nonviolent resistance and suffering love is the way of the Lamb's War. Our lives now should be a vision of shalom, a foretaste of the way the whole world will be in the end. This end is not physical destruction, but rather all things in right relationship, heaven and earth as one. To follow the way of the Lamb in this journey will require active resistance (because the evil of violence, hatred and oppression still holds sway) and may involve suffering (as the alternative to perpetuating evil), but we have received a promised that the ultimate destination will be worth it.
Collectively, the followers of Jesus are called to offer a visible public witness to a new way of being human, to a new creation. The way of nonviolent resistance and suffering love is the way of the Lamb's War. Our lives now should be a vision of shalom, a foretaste of the way the whole world will be in the end. This end is not physical destruction, but rather all things in right relationship, heaven and earth as one. To follow the way of the Lamb in this journey will require active resistance (because the evil of violence, hatred and oppression still holds sway) and may involve suffering (as the alternative to perpetuating evil), but we have received a promised that the ultimate destination will be worth it.
It seems that missed here is what historically has been the prime response and remains key - living a life of positive faithfulness which serves as an example of a different way.
ReplyDeleteDear Bill, yes agreed. I suppose that's a danger of sharing something here prompted by a conversation that is happening elsewhere. It is implicit in the priority given to following the way of Jesus. It has been explicit in the webinar discussions. This week, among other things, we will be engaging with Michael J Gorman's book 'The Death of the Messiah and the Birth of the New Covenant: A (Not-So)New Model of Atonement (2014, James Clarke & Co)in which Gorman argues that very point. He calls himself an Anabaptist Methodist. Shalom, Stuart.
ReplyDeleteA basic option you shouldn't neglect is that of pragmatically working for incremental improvements. For example, in 1916 the Quaker MP Edmund Harvey (1875-1955) succeeded in getting a (conditional) exemption from conscription for conscientious objectors. Harvey's winning recognition of the rights of conscience was a great achievement, and one that is still with us today.
ReplyDeleteI agree Mark. Resistance by individuals and groups can achieve some positive change within social systems and institutions. Harvey and other COs did this, often at great cost and suffering. The system, however, remained essentially violent despite this. I believe that, overall, much has improved over the centuries. However, within the context of enormous economic, technical and military power, the stakes are far higher than ever before. Do we follow the way of Jesus (nonviolence, compassion and justice) or the way of division, hatred, violence and injustice? In my view, the former is the only hope of species survival. The latter will lead to our destruction, taking most other species with us. Shalom, Stuart.
ReplyDelete